data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f14f/4f14faa63ff110885cb317658e69ad457bc2acee" alt=""
3/28/2010
The Snicko
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f14f/4f14faa63ff110885cb317658e69ad457bc2acee" alt=""
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Technology used in sports is often a compliment to human limitations, and it has in many ways improved games and their experience. It is important to remember though that also technology has got its constraints and isn't definitely exact. Hence there are various reasons to strive towards balance between technology and human capital in sports.
In this blog we aim to highlight the different technologies creating changes to the game and rules of the Indian Premier League (IPL), in addition to how technology is affecting all the groups of interests: players, viewers, coaches and decision makers.
Amazing to see how much technology can be implemented in a sport..
ReplyDeleteSo how did they used to judge this before this technology existed?? And, is it that beneficial to the game? Does it make it more fair maybe?
ReplyDeleteBefore this technology existed, it was all upto the field umpire who stands on the pitch. It does make it fair but its still not fool proof. As it only detects the sounds, which may also occur due to the movement of the foot, friction between the pads, etc.
ReplyDeleteSo Lav, as a cricket follower, do you think "The Snicko" has benefited in someway the sport? What do clubs or athletes think about it?
ReplyDeleteSorry to compare it to baseball, but as we all know in baseball all the decisions are still made by an Umpire. I support the idea of Umpires making the final decisions rather than technology.